I added the 
system described in the manuals, to my Toyota Corolla 1999 (shown to the left). According to the EPA, it is supposed to get 30 MPG on the highway. In 2007 I measured over 61 MPG. The measurement was based on a simple road test and not on scientific methods, but I was very pleased. The trucker in the other photo, Carter Blankenship III from Fairview, Tennessee (standing in the middle between Tom Lang and Bill Lang), and also Jerry Young from Sparks, Nevada, reported to me huge savings on their trucks (over 1 million miles on both of their engines!!!) - both said they were saving $350 a week, as well as engines feeling like new and pulling like crazy uphill with heavy loads! Let me give you more specific numbers from The Nevada 18-wheeler that I have not verified, these are just verbal testimonials reported to me: from 5.5 MPG steadily to 6.6 MPG using a 6-pack system, and with a full load on the trailer maximum speed uphill from 35 MPH to 45 MPH on the same hill. In my primitive calculations, this translates to 20% better mileage on a loaded 18-wheeler big rig truck, and over 28% increase in engine power.
The answer to this question, then, is that you CANNOT drive on water alone. No way. We use water - or more correctly Hydrogen and Oxygen extracted from water - as a supplement to the gasoline (petrol) or diesel fuel.
Skeptics claim that you cannot run your car on water because you cannot get enough energy from generating hydrogen - the energy you would be putting in would be greater than the energy from the hydrogen. They have it all wrong!!! Water-fuel does NOT mean running your car on water, and not even running on hydrogen made from water! This is a major misunderstanding! When NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Patent Office and Detroit reported reduction of harmful emissions and improvements in engine efficiency, they were specifically saying ADDING A SMALL AMOUNT OF HYDROGEN TO INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES STILL CONSUMING PETROL FUEL.
The potential savings do not come from burning hydrogen and oxygen as fuel, because we have too little of it, per minute. The potential savings and reduction in emissions can only be attributed to the more complete combustion of the gasoline or diesel fuel. Read the U.S. Patent and the documents from NASA and U.S. Department of Transportation to understand this concept.
In my opinion, and you are welcome to check it out and refund your money if you open the books and find BS, is that a SIMPLE technology that you can have right now, allows you to experiment with PRACTICAL and AFFORDABLE hydrogen-from-water technologies, marked by extraordinary simplicity and low cost. Attached to my manuals is a list of parts that show exactly how to manufacture a hydrogen generator for about $15, and a whole system for about $53. The list of sources is from 2006 when I have been building experimental kits and shipping them worldwide myself, in order to collect feedbacks for my research. (I have sold around 200 systems back then.)
In 2009 I have updated my list of materials and sources, and found better and sometimes cheaper ways of getting the same products and systems. When you order my manuals you will get my complete lists with the latest research and updates. Also added in 2009: a list of sources for low cost parts in the United Kingdom.
Question: - WHERE IS THE SAVING COMING FROM? AREN'T MODERN CARS SUPPOSED TO BE THE BEST POSSIBLE TECH?
Answer: - IN MY HUMBLE OPINION, POSSIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS COMES NOT FROM MAGIC - IT COMES FROM ENHANCING THE EFFICIENCY OF POORLY DESIGNED ENGINES!!! I've read that some engines today use 20% of the energy stored in the fuel to actually drive - and WASTE 80% to heat, pollution (unburned fuel!) and vibration. If we could reduce the waste then we could possibly get what NASA, U.S. Department of Transportation, US Patent Office and Detroit are talking about, i.e., enhanced efficiency and reduced emissions.
In other words, seems to me that we are simply tapping into a waste band.
THIS IS MY PERSONAL NON-SCIENTIFIC VIEW BASED ON EXPLANATIONS THAT I HAVE HEARD FROM OTHER EXPERIMENTERS. IT IS NOT A SCIENTIFIC STATEMENT OR THEORY BUT AN EFFORT TO MAKE SENSE OF THE CHANGES I HAVE SEEN IN MY FUEL ECONOMY AND EMISSIONS.
- is NOT my invention and is not new either. Based on old "forgotten" US Patents, Bill and Tom Lang of Gulf Laboratories, USA (www.WaterToGas.com) has developed technology that uses a little electricity out of your car/truck battery, to separate water into a gas called "HHO" (2 parts Hydrogen + 1 Oxygen). HHO, also called Brown's Gas, Water-Fuel or Hydroxy, has been shown to burn (don't try this at home - it is VERY combustible!!!) - while the end product of its burning is... water! By the way, pound for pound HHO GAS IS CLAIMED TO BE 3 TIMES MORE POTENT THAN GASOLINE and is therefore a fast growing trend between experimenters of performance boost and MPG.
- Since Bill and Tom Lang wanted their development to be "Open Source" (open to the public for royalty-free experimentation, development and even sell-your-own), I added some improvements of my own and documented the technology in great detail so you can follow their footsteps. The resulting research is what you will find in my manuals.
- You will discover how simple and affordable these devices are.
- Also easy to install and maintain if you are technical. If you don't like working on cars, it is absolutely OK with me that you make a free copy of my manuals for your mechanic or technical friend, and have them install it for you.
- You get permission to replicate our devices - for POTENTIAL personal savings or business profit!
- Useful for carb or fuel injection, gasoline (petrol), as well as diesel and turbo-diesel.
- Experimenters having old/new cars, motorhomes and now even big rig trucks reported to benefit from .
